Competitiveness, innovation and productivity of the country

Authors:
Davit Hakhverdyan1, Mher Shahinyan1
1. Armenian State University of Economics (Republic of Armenia)
Pages:
108 - 123
Language:
English
Cite as:
Hakhverdyan, D., & Shahinyan, M. (2022). Competitiveness, Innovation and Productivity of the Country. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 108-123. http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.1-08
Received:
17.01.2022
Accepted:
16.03.2022
Published:
17.03.2022


Annotation

This study discusses and investigates the key determinants of country competitiveness. An analysis of the available literature relating to the key determinants of the country’s competitiveness makes it possible to mention that their determinants are not yet completely explored. The issue is that the current literature examines the impact of GDP per capita and human capital while omitting important factors affecting a country’s competitiveness. Knowledge capital is one of the main factors of economic growth and competitiveness. Indigenous innovation contributes to the production of knowledge capital, while FDI and import trade are two major pathways for technological diffusion. As a result, when studying the causes of a country's competitiveness, the effects of these elements are not negligible. The following logical processes are used to investigate the topic of main factors of a country's competitiveness: first, a theoretical model outlining the primary factors of a country's competitiveness is studied; second, acceptable measurements for a country's competitiveness are selected; third, a balanced panel data set is created, and unknown parameter estimation is carried out. The GMM two-step panel data estimation technique is the major methodological instrument used in the article. Annual data from 2001 to 2020 on eight macroeconomic variables are included in the database (total 1040 observations per macroeconomic variable (52 countries, 20 years)). The study proved both practically and theoretically that: 1) the lagged value of the dependent variable has a positive and considerable impact on the competitiveness of the country; 2) the labor productivity of a country is an essential factor of competitiveness; the higher a country's labor productivity, the more probable it is to produce and export; 3) human capital and research and development are major sources of knowledge creation that directly contribute to a country's competitiveness; 4) the influence of FDI and imports on competitiveness has been proven to be significant; 5) weak institutions in emerging and developing economies have a negative impact on export sophistication and, as a result, a country's competitiveness. The research findings should be relevant to economic policymakers and model developers interested in estimating and evaluating structural systems of equations


Keywords
competitiveness, dynamic panel data model, export sophistication index, foreign direct investment, GMM system estimation, human capital, labor productivity.


Links
  1. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The review of economic studies, 58(2), 277-297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Auzina-Emsina, A. (2014). Labour productivity, economic growth and global competitiveness in post-crisis period. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 317-321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Baum, C. F. (2006). An introduction to modern econometrics using Stata. Stata Press. [Google Scholar]
  4. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cabral, M. H. C., & Veiga, P. (2010). Determinants of export diversification and sophistication in sub-Saharan Africa (No. wp550). Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge university press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dresch, A., Collatto, D. C., & Lacerda, D. P. (2018). Theoretical understanding between competitiveness and productivity: firm-level. Ingeniería y competitividad, 20(2), 69-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fagerberg, J. (1998). Why Growth Rates Differ, In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.). Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter Publishers, London. Retrieved from [Link]
  9. Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy, 37(9), 1417-1435. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
  10. Finger, J. M., & Kreinin, M. E. (1979). A measure of export similarity and its possible uses. The Economic Journal, 89(356), 905-912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hausmann, R., Hwang, J., & Rodrik, D. (2007). What you export matters. Journal of economic growth, 12(1), 1-25. [Google Scholar] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 106(26), 10570-10575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jona-Lasinio, C., & Meliciani, V. (2018). Productivity growth and international competitiveness: does intangible capital matter?. Intereconomics, 53(2), 58-62. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kharlamova, G., & Vertelieva, O. (2013). The international competitiveness of countries: economic-mathematical approach. Economics & Sociology, 6(2), 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lall, S., Weiss, J., & Zhang, J. (2006). The “sophistication” of exports: A new trade measure. World Development, 34(2), 222-237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Laureti, T., & Viviani, A. (2011). Competitiveness and productivity: a case study of Italian firms. Applied Economics, 43(20), 2615-2625. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
  17. Lin, F., Weldemicael, E. O., & Wang, X. (2017). Export sophistication increases income in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from 1981–2000. Empirical Economics, 52(4), 1627-1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lopes, J. (2014). Evolution of the Concept of Innovation and Its Relationship with Productivity & Competitiveness. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(12), 1-28. Retrieved from [Link]
  19. Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 1417-1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rijesh, R. (2019). International trade and productivity growth in Indian industry: Evidence from the organized manufacturing sector. Journal of South Asian Development, 14(1), 1-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71-S102. [Google Scholar]
  22. Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The stata journal, 9(1), 86-136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. García-Sánchez, A., Siles, D., & de Mar Vázquez-Méndez, M. (2018). Innovation, competitiveness and prosperity: A factor analysis of innovation indicators in spain. Management, 6(5), 375-383. [Google Scholar]
  24. Schott, P. K. (2008). The relative sophistication of Chinese exports. Economic policy, 23(53), 6-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sterlacchini, A. (2008). R&D, higher education and regional growth: Uneven linkages among European regions. Research Policy, 37(6-7), 1096-1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tadevosyan, R. (2021). Core Determinants of Companies Innovation Performance: Case for Armenia. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 108-116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tovmasyan, G. (2021). Capital investments, tourist tax and tourism development: the case study of Armenia. Economics and Sociology, 14(1), 199-213. [Google Scholar]
  28. Weldemicael, E. (2012). Determinants of export sophistication. The University of Melbourne. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wulong, G., & Beiling, Y. (2016). Productivity Growth and International Competitiveness. Special Issue: Productivity, Measurement, Drivers and Trends, 63(1), 113-133. [CrossRef]
  30. Wysokińska, Z. (2003). Competitiveness and its relationships with productivity and sustainable development. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 11(3), 42. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhu, S., Fu, X., Lai, M., & Xuan, J. (2010). What drives the export sophistication of countries. J World Econ, 4, 28-43. [Google Scholar]