Conceptual Relationships Between Country Image and Economic Security

Authors:
Liudmyla Mikhnevych1, Victor Marchenko1, Petur Hristov2, Aleksandra Kuzior3
1. Kyiv National Economics University named after Vadym Hetman (Ukraine)
2. Varna Free University “Chernorizets Hrabar” (Bulgaria)
3. Silesian University of Technology (Poland)
Pages:
285 - 293
Language:
English
Cite as:
Mikhnevych, L., Marchenko, V. Hristov, P., & Kuzior, A. (2020). Conceptual Relationships Between Country Image and Economic Security. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 285-293. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.1-24


Annotation

The paper deals with the analysis of the linking between country image and level of economic security. The studies confirmed that ongoing tendency on world competitiveness justified considering direct and indirect dimensions which influence on the country’s economic security. The authors generalised the factors which affected the economic security of the country. The finding proved that one of the significant indirect parameters is the country image. The authors analysed and summarised the most appropriate definitions of country brand and image. The authors analysed the frequency of country brand and image in the scientific paper. The paper aimed to identify the scientific clusters on the investigation of economic security and the country’s brand. The study used the bibliometric analysis using software VOSviewer, Web of Science and Scopus Tools Analysis. The data of analysis was obtained from the scientific database Scopus and Web of Science for 1991-2019 years. For the analysis, the papers were selected as the criteria as follows: English language; published for 1991-2019 years; contained the keywords brand, image, county and security. The results of the analysis proved that the paper which used the term “country image” is more than “country brand” in Scopus and Web of Science. The findings from the Web of Science and Scopus Tools Analysis confirm the hypothesis on the increasing tendency of publishing activities papers which focused on the analysis of security and country’s image. The visualising of co-authorship by country allowed identifying that the 50% papers published by the scientists with the American, Ukrainian, Canadian, Spanish and Russian affiliations. The VOSviewer results allowed identifying two significant scientific clusters as follows: country image and economic security. Besides, between the two most significant cluster were as mediators: governance, nation branding, developing countries and environment. Besides, analysing the new publication for 2015-2019 years, the most cited papers on economic security connected with analysis not only quantitively economic parameters but also with political, sustainable development and country’s image. The bibliometric analysis formed the background for checking the casual relationship between image and economic security of the country.


Keywords
bibliometric analysis, brand, brand management, country brand, VOSviewer.


Links
  1. Bauman, Z. (2000). Social issues of law and order. British Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 205-221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bilan, Y., Brychko, M., Buriak, A., & Vasilyeva, T. (2019a). Financial, business and trust cycles: The issues of synchronisation. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakultet Au Rijeci, 37(1), 113–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bilan, Y., Кuzmenko, Ð., & Boiko, A. (2019b). Research on the impact of industry 4.0 on entrepreneurship in various countries worldwide. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019: Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020 (pp. 2373–2384). International Business Information Management Association, IBIMA.
  4. Bilan, Y., Lyeonov, S., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2019c). Brand management and macroeconomic stability of the country. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bilan, Y., Raišienė, A. G., Vasilyeva, T., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2019d). Public Governance efficiency and macroeconomic stability: Examining convergence of social and political determinants. Public Policy and Administration, 18(2), 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bilan, Y., Vasilyeva, T., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2019e). EU vector of Ukraine development: Linking between macroeconomic stability and social progress. International Journal of Business and Society, 20(2), 433–450. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bloom, D. E., Chatterji, S., Kowal, P., Lloyd-Sherlock, P., McKee, M., Rechel, B., . . . Smith, J. P. (2015). Macroeconomic implications of population ageing and selected policy responses. The Lancet, 385(9968), 649-657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cheddad, A., Condell, J., Curran, K., & Mc Kevitt, P. (2010). Digital image steganography: Survey and analysis of current methods. Signal Processing, 90(3), 727-752. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
  9. Chen, J., Zhu, X., & Zhong, M. (2019). Nonlinear effects of financial factors on fluctuations in nonferrous metals prices: A markov-switching VAR analysis. Resources Policy, 61, 489-500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. GrenÄÃková, A., Bilan, Y., Samusevych, Y., & Vysochyna, A. (2019). Drivers and inhibitors of entrepreneurship development in central and eastern European countries. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019: Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020 (pp. 2536–2547). International Business Information Management Association, IBIMA.
  11. Haagh, L. (2019). The political economy of governance capacity and institutional change: The case of basic income security reform in european welfare states. Social Policy and Society, 18(2), 243-263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ibragimov, Z., Lyeonov, S., & Pimonenko, T. (2019a). Green investing for SDGS: EU experience for developing countries. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 867-876.[Google Scholar]
  13. Ibragimov, Z., Vasylieva, T., & Lyulyov, O. (2019b). The national economy competitiveness: effect of macroeconomic stability, renewable energy on economic growth. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 877-886. [Google Scholar]
  14. Inglehart, R., & Abramson, P. R. (1994). Economic security and value change. American Political Science Review, 88(2), 336-354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jun, E., Kim, W., & Chang, S. H. (2009). The analysis of security cost for different energy sources. Applied Energy, 86(10), 1894-1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kendall, G. E., Nguyen, H., & Ong, R. (2019). The association between income, wealth, economic security perception, and health: A longitudinal australian study. Health Sociology Review, 28(1), 20-38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kuzior, A., Kwilinski, A., Tkachenko, V., & Tkachenko, V. (2019). Sustainable development of organisations based on the combinatorial model of artificial intelligence. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(2), 1353-1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]  
  18. Luechinger, S., Meier, S., & Stutzer, A. (2010). Why does unemployment hurt the employed?: Evidence from the life satisfaction gap between the public and the private sector. Journal of Human Resources, 45(4), 998-1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lyulyov, O. V., & Pimonenko, T. V. (2017). Lotka-Volterra model as an instrument of the investment and innovative processes stability analysis. Marketing and Management of Innovations, (1), 159–169. [CrossRef]
  20. Lyulyov, O., Chygryn, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2018). National brand as a marketing determinant of macroeconomic stability. Marketing and Management of Innovations, (3), 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Milberg, W., & Winkler, D. (2011). Economic and social upgrading in global production networks: Problems of theory and measurement. International Labour Review, 150(3-4), 341-365.[CrossRef]
  22. Nation Brands 2019. (2019). The annual report on the most valuable and strongest nation brands. Retrieved from: https://brandirectory.com/rankings/nation-brands/
  23. Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (2002). An index of economic well-being for selected OECD countries. Review of Income and Wealth, 48(3), 291-316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]  
  25. Pimonenko, T. (2018). Ukrainian Perspectives for Developing Green Investment Market: EU Experience. Economics and Region, 4(71), 35-45. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rekunenko, I. I., Hrytsenko, L. L., Boiarko, I. M., & Kostyrko, R. A. (2019). Financial debt market in the system of indicators of development of the economy of the country. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(29), 430–439. [CrossRef]
  27. Seguino, S. (2010). The global economic crisis, its gender and ethnic implications, and policy responses. Gender and Development, 18(2), 179-199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]  
  28. Shvindina, H. (2019). Coopetition as an emerging trend in research: Perspectives for safety & security. Safety, 5(3). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]  
  29. Solability. (2019). The Global Sustainability Competitiveness Index. Retrieved from: http://solability.com/the-global-sustainable-competitiveness-index/the-index
  30. Tkachenko, V., Kwilinski, A., Kaminska, B., Tkachenko, I., & Puzyrova, P. (2019). Development and Effectiveness of Financial Potential Management of Enterprises in Modern Conditions. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 3(30), 85-94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tkachenko, V., Kwilinski, A., Klymchuk, M., & Tkachenko, I. (2019). The Economic-Mathematical Development of Buildings Construction Model Optimization on the Basis of Digital Economy. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 27(2), 119-123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vasilieva, T., Lieonov, S., Makarenko, I., & Sirkovska, N. (2017). Sustainability information disclosure as an instrument of marketing communication with stakeholders: markets, social and economic aspects. Marketing and Management of Innovations, (4), 350–357.  [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vasylieva, T. A., Lieonov, S. V., Petrushenko, Yu. M., & Vorontsova, A. S. (2017). Investments in the system of lifelong education as an effective factor of socio-economic development. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(23), 426–436. [CrossRef]
  34. Vasylieva, T., Lyulyov, O., Bilan, Y., & Streimikiene, D. (2019). Sustainable economic development and greenhouse gas emissions: The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption, GDP, and corruption. Energies, 12(17), 3289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Williams, A. S., & Jobes, P. C. (1990). Economic and quality-of-life considerations in urban-rural migration. Journal of Rural Studies, 6(2), 187-194. [CrossRef]
  36. World Data Bank. (2019). Retrieved from: https://data.worldbank.org