Energy-Efficient Innovations: Marketing, Management and Law Supporting

Volodymyr Panchenko1, Yurii Harust2, Yana Us2, Olena Korobets2, Vladyslav Pavlyk2
1. Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University (Ukraine)
2. Sumy State University (Ukraine)
256 - 264
Cite as:
Panchenko, V., Harust, Yu., Us, Ya., Korobets, O., & Pavlyk, V. (2020). Energy-Efficient Innovations: Marketing, Management and Law Supporting. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 256-264.


This paper summarises the arguments and counterarguments within the scientific discussion on the issue of promotion energy-efficient innovations by marketing, management and law supporting. The innovative development is considered to be an essential condition to provide a high level of social and economic development. Thus, energy-efficient innovations are considered to be among the most critical drivers of qualitative economic growth and increasing the country’s competitiveness in the world market. Systematisation literary sources and approaches for solving the problem of promoting energy-efficient innovations indicated that government and scientists give the powerful punch in energy-efficient development. In view of this, it is appropriate to do the bibliometric research on publication activity on energy-efficient innovation from law aspect. The primary purpose of the study is to analyse the structure and dynamic of scientific publications in the field of energy-efficient legislation in the economic subject areas. The object of study is the chosen publications indexed in the Scopus database by keywords such as: «energy-efficient innovations», «energy law», «environmental legislation», «energy-efficient policy» in the category «title, abstract, keywords». The current study involved data from 1913 papers published on 13 languages in the subject area «Business. Management and Accounting» and «Economics, Econometrics, and Finance» from 2000 to 2019. Using VOSviewer, bibliometric analysis of publications on the issue of energy-efficient legislation was conducted from the view of the publication activity dynamic, considering the most impact articles, and countries in the issues of energy-efficient legislation researches. According to the obtained results, the increasing dynamic of publication activity from 2000 to 2019 was detected. Furthermore, it was visualised four clusters of countries’ collaborations by co-authorship as follows: 1) between the USA, the EU countries (including the United Kingdom) and China; 2) the EU countries, as well as South American such as Brazil and Chile; 3) African countries and the EU countries; 4) between Asian and African countries. Furthermore, the authors highlighted the most influencing articles in the field of energy-efficient innovations that could be the basis for future investigations promoting innovative activity in the field of energy-efficient development.

bibliometric analysis, energy-efficient innovations, environmental legislation, energy policy, Scopus, VOSviewer.

  1. Allcott, H., & Greenstone, M. (2012). Is there an energy efficiency gap? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(1), 3-28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Beckman, J., Hertel, T., & Tyner, W. (2011) Validating energy-oriented CGE models. Energy Economics, 33(5,799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bilan, Yu., Brychko, M. M., Buriak, A., & Vasilyeva, T. A. (2019). Financial, business and trust cycles: the issues of synchronisation. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brychko, M., & Semenog, A. (2018). Efficiency as a new ideology of trust-building corporate governance. Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), 14(1232-2019-878), 913–925. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
  5. Bunse, K., Vodicka, M., Schonsleben, P., Brulhart, M., & Ernst, F. O. (2011). Integrating energy efficiency performance in production management–gap analysis between industrial needs and scientific literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(6-7), 667–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Carlini, E.M., Ibba, S., Pascucci, C., & Moroni, S. (2017). Energy union is about reinventing system operation: Europe's energy future looking towards energy efficiency, renewable energies and consumer empowerment. In 2017 AEIT International Annual Conference (1-6). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cheng, M., Shao, Z., Yang, C., & Tang, X. (2019). Analysis of Coordinated Development of Energy and Environment in China’s Manufacturing Industry under Environmental Regulation: A Comparative Study of Sub-Industries. Sustainability, 11(22), 6510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Frohling, C., Wubbels, T., Meyn, M., Thomasberger, J., & Bui, P. (2015). Innovative gas cleaning solutions and utilisation of bof gases: Operational results and benefits. AISTech – Iron and Steel Technology Conference Proceedings, 2, 1691-1700
  9. Godden, L., & Kallies, A. (2018). Smart infrastructure: innovative energy technology, climate mitigation, and consumer protection in Australia and Germany. Innovation in Energy Law and Technology: Dynamic Solutions for Energy Transitions, 1. [Google Scholar]
  10. Herring, H., & Roy, R. (2007). Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect. Technovation, 27(4), 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ibragimov, Z., Vasylieva, T. & Lyulyov, O. (2019). The national economy competitiveness: effect of macroeconomic stability, renewable energy on economic growth. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 878-887. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaveshnikov, N.Y. (2014). European Union Energy Saving Policy. MGIMO Review of International Relations., 4 (37), 109-115.
  13. Lin, F., Zhou, Y., Qiu, T. (2015). An energy-efficient self-organisation routing strategy in tree networks. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web, 2(4). [Google Scholar]
  14. Mentel, G., Vasilyeva, T., Samusevych, Y., & Pryymenko, S. (2018). Regional differentiation of electricity prices: Social-equitable approach. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management. 21(5-6), 354-372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Myroshnychenko, I., Makarenko, I., Smolennikov, D., & Buriak, A. (2019). The Approach to Managing Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility in Manufacturing. TEM Journal. 8(3), 740-748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pakhnenko, O., Liuta, O., & Pihul, N. (2018). Methodological approaches to assessment of the efficiency of business entities activity. Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), 14(1232-2019-744), 143-151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pan, X., Ai, B., Li, C., Pan, X., & Yan, Y. (2017). Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, technological innovation and energy efficiency based on large scale provincial panel data in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 428-435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Panchenko, O. V., Myroshnychenko, L. O., & Zhulavskyi, A. (2018). Ecological and Economic Evaluation of the Household Solid Wastes Using in Thermal Power Industry. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY & DEVELOPMENT, 33(1), 41-49.
  19. Pimonenko, T., Lyulyov, O., & Us, Y. (2019). Marketing strategies of green investments: basic concepts and specific features. Herald of Ternopil National Economic University, (1 (91)), 177-185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pimonenko, T., Lyulyova, L., & Us, Y. (2017). Energy-efficient house: economic, ecological and social justification in Ukrainian conditions. Environmental economics, (8, Iss. 4), 53-61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rak, A. (2018). Selected aspects of technological innovations management in district heating companies. In MATEC Web of Conferences, ( Vol. 183, p. 04003). EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]
  22. Scopus. (2020). Retrived from
  23. Sokolenko, L. F., Tiutiunyk, I. V., & Leus, D. V. (2017). Ecological and economic security assessment in the system of regional environmental management: A case study of Ukraine. International Journal of Ecology and Development. 32, 27-35. [Google Scholar]
  24. Suzuki, M. (2015). Identifying roles of international institutions in clean energy technology innovation and diffusion in the developing countries: matching barriers with roles of the institutions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ukey, N., & Kulkarni, L. (2017, April). Implementation of energy efficient algorithm in delay tolerant networks. In 2017 2nd International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT) (pp. 93-99). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vairamohan, B., Samotyj, M., Pournaras, N., & Harrison, B. C. (2017, November). Applying innovations in circulator pump technology for commercial building applications. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech) (pp. 1-7). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vasylieva, T. A., Harust, Y. V., Vynnychenko, N. V., & Vysochyna, A. V. (2018). Optimisation of the financial decentralisation level as an instrument for the country’s innovative economic development regulation. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 382-391. [Google Scholar]
  28. Vasylieva, T. A., Lieonov, S. V., Makarenko, I. O., & Sirkovska, N. (2017). Sustainability information disclosure as an instrument of marketing communication with stakeholders: markets, social and economic aspects. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 350 – 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. VOSviewer. (2020). Retrived from
  30. Yanchenko, A., Androsenko, N., & Ivanov, G. (2018). Modern Mechanisms of Standardisation for Improving the Ecological Situation in the Regions. Economy of region, 1(2), 516-529. [Google Scholar]